Outcomes of a faculty development conference in Mongolia

  • Deborah A Kroeker University of Kansas School of Medicine
  • Anne Walling University of Kansas School of Medicine-Wichita
Keywords: faculty development, medical education, conference, Mongolia


Background: Medical Education International (MEI), an organization that provides faculty development to medical educators in developing countries, wanted information on the program effectiveness of its faculty development conferences.

Objectives: To assess the outcomes of an MEI faculty development conference in Mongolia on the knowledge, confidence in applying new skills, and attitudes of participants.

Methods: A retrospective pretest survey of participants was used to assess the outcomes of a 3-day faculty development conference given twice at the Mongolian National University of Medical Sciences.  The survey assessed participant views on their ability to meet the objectives of the conference, the perceived overall value of the conference, and their suggestions for improvements in future MEI conferences.

Results: Twenty participants (65%) completed surveys. Participants reported significant changes in agreement with their ability to meet the objectives of the conference in all of the pre-post measures (pre-post p<0.001). The value of attending the conference was ranked at a mean score of 4.05 on a Likert scale from 1 to 5, with 1 indicating “Strongly Disagree” and 5 “Strongly Agree.”  Conference attendees indicated interest in additional training on more advanced topics.    

Conclusion: Overall, the findings indicate that conference attendees gained knowledge and confidence in applying new skills and valued the training received from a faculty development conference led by physicians from the USA.  Further research is needed to determine long-term impact on residency education in Mongolia.


Author Biographies

Deborah A Kroeker, University of Kansas School of Medicine

Associate Professor

Department of Pediatrics

University of Kansas School of Medicine--Wichita


Anne Walling, University of Kansas School of Medicine-Wichita
MB, ChB, FFPHM, Associate Dean for Faculty Affairs, University of Kamsas School of Medicine, Wichita, Professor of Family and Community Medicine, USA


Newman L, Pelletier S, Lown B. Measuring the impact of longitudinal faculty development: a study of academic achievement. Acad Med, Advance Online publication. 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000001016

Baasandorj D. Faculty development program needs at Mongolian State Universities: content and strategies [Doctoral Dissertation]. 2010. Retrieved from ProQuest (DAI-A 71/09)

Hegde P. Faculty development trends in medical education: a review. SE Asian J Med Educ. 2013;7(2),11-6.

Majumder M. Issues and priorities of medical education research in Asia. Ann Acad Med Singap. 2004;33(2),257-63.

Steinert Y, Mann K, Anderson B, Barrnett BM, Centeno A, Naismith L, et al. A systematic review of faculty development initiatives designed to improve teaching effectiveness in medical education: BEME Guide No. 8. Med Teach. 2016;38(8),769-86. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2016.1181851

Houston T, Ferenchick G, Clark J, Bowen J, Branch W, Alguire P, et al. Faculty development needs. J Gen Intern Med. 2004;19(4), 375-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1497.2004.30619.x

Wong J, Fang Y. Improving Clinical Teaching in China: initial report of a multihospital pilot faculty development effort. TeachLearnMed. 2012;24(4),355-60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10401334.2012.719801

Bland CJ, Schmitz CC, Stritter FF, Henry RC, Aluise JJ. Successful faculty in academic medicine: Essential skills and how to acquire them. New York: Springer-Verlag; 1990.

ACGME. 2010a. Accreditation council for graduate medical education: glossary of terms. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. [Updated 2013 July 1; cited on 2016 Sept 21.] Available from: https://www.acgme.org/Portals/0/PDFs/ab_ACGMEglossary.pdf

Lamb T, Tschillar R. Evaluating learning in professional development workshops: Using the retrospective pretest. Journal of Research in Professional Learning. 2005;1,1-9.

Cresswell, J. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches. Los Angeles: SAGE. 2014.

Kikukawa M, Stalmeijer, RE, Emura S, Roff S Scherpbier AJ. An instrument for evaluating clinical teaching in Japan: Content validity and cultural sensitivity. BMC Med Educ. 2014;14,179-86. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-14-179

How to Cite
Kroeker, D. A., & Walling, A. (2016). Outcomes of a faculty development conference in Mongolia. Christian Journal for Global Health, 3(2), 38-48. https://doi.org/10.15566/cjgh.v3i2.146