A realist evaluation of the formation of groups of people with disabilities in northern India
Background: Disabled Peoples’ Organisations (DPOs) are organisations established by and for people with disabilities. Formation of DPOs in low- and middle-income countries is a key component of disability-inclusive development strategies. In some contexts, organisations involved in disability-inclusive development work in partnership with people with disabilities to bring together groups of people with disabilities (DPGs) that may go on to become DPOs. While there is evidence that such groups can achieve beneficial outcomes for people with disabilities, they seem to form and function differently in different settings and little is understood about why this is the case. This study aimed to explore how and why different factors affect the development and operation of DPGs by investigating the contextual factors and mechanisms that enabled and hindered the formation and functioning of DPGs in north India.
Methods: This study adopted a realist approach to evaluation. Preliminary context-mechanism-outcome configurations were developed, tested empirically and refined by undertaking five case studies in Uttarakhand state, India.
Results: Results from this study were grouped under the broad, emergent themes of factors related to: 1) external supports; 2) community and physical environment; and 3) group composition. It was found that external entities could support the development of DPGs by advocating for the rights of people with disabilities and providing information, knowledge and funding to groups. Support from local village leadership was central to facilitating group formation and functioning, but the benefit of this support was amplified when DPGs formed strong networks with other, similar groups. DPGs displayed a capacity for stimulating positive societal changes in regard to disability through influencing societal understandings of disability and improving inclusion and participation of people with disabilities.
Conclusion: While the results of this study are specific to the context in which it was undertaken, many findings were consistent with those in the literature, suggesting that there may be common principles which can be applied to other contexts. By providing insight into the contextual factors that affected DPG formation and function, the findings of this study may assist those involved in DPG formation to adapt models and methods to better suit specific contexts.
2. WHO: World report on disability. World Health Organisation; c2011 [cited 2016 June 9] Available from: http://www.who.int/disabilities/world_report/2011/report.pdf
3. WHO: Health statistics and information systems. World Health Organisation; c2016 [cited 2016 April 7] Available from: http://www.who.int/healthinfo/global_burden_disease/definition_regions/en/
4. Kumar S, Roy G, Kar S. Disability and rehabilitation services in India: Issues and challenges. Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care. 2012; 1(1): 69-73. doi: 10.4103/2249-4863.94458
5. Ramachandra S, Allagh K, Kumar H, Marella M, Pant H, Mahesh, D et al. Prevalence of disability among adults using rapid assessment of disability tool in a rural district of South India. Disability and Health Journal. Forthcoming 2016.
6. Disabled people's organisation (DPOs). People with Disabilities Australia. c2010-2016 [cited 2015 September 16] Available from: http://www.pwd.org.au/student-section/disabled-people-s-organisations-dpos.html
7. Enns H. The role of organizations of disabled people: A disabled peoples' international discussion paper. Independent Living Institute; 2015. Available from: http://www.independentliving.org/docs5/RoleofOrgDisPeople.html
8. CBM: Inclusion made easy: A quick program guide to disability in development [Internet]. CBM; [updated May 2012 May 29; cited 2016 May 10]. Available from: http://www.cbm.org/article/downloads/78851/CBM_Inclusion_Made_Easy_-_complete_guide.pdf.
9. Young R, Reeve M, Grills N. The function of Disabled Peoples' Organisations (DPOs) in low- and middle-income countries: a literature review. Disability, CBR and Inclusive Development. Forthcoming 2016.
10. Realist Evaluation. Better Evaluation. 2014. [cited 2015 September 9] Available from: http://betterevaluation.org/approach/realist_evaluation
11. Overseas Development Institute: Realist impact evaluation: An introduction. ODI, Westhorp [updated 2014 September; cited 2016 September 9] Available from: http://www.odi.org/publications/8716-methods-lab-realist-impact-evaluation-introduction
12. Pawson R, Tilley N. Realistic evaluation. London: Sage Publications; 1997.
13. McNair J. Disability and human supports. Christian Journal for Global Health. 2015; 2(2): 10-15. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.15566/cjgh.v2i2.86
14. Grills N, Robinson P, Phillip, M. Networking between community health programmes: A case study outlining the effectiveness, barriers and enablers. BMC Health Services Research. 2012; 12(206). doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-206
15. Armstrong M. Disability self-help organizations in the developing world: A case study from Malaysia. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research. 1993; 16 (3): 185-194. doi: 10.1097/00004356-199309000-00002.
16. Cobley D. Towards economic participation: Examining the impact of the convention on the rights of persons with disabilities in India. Disability and Society. 2013; 28 (4): 441-455. doi: 10.1080/09687599.2012.717877.
17. Deepak S, dos Santos L, Griffo G, de Santana D, Kumar J, Bapu S. Organisations of persons with disabilities and Community-Based Rehabilitation. Asia Pacific Disability Rehabilitation Journal. 2013; 24 (3): 5-20. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5463/dcid.v24i3.269
18. Dhungana, Kusakabe K. The role of self-help groups in empowering disabled women: A case study in Kathmandu Valley, Nepal. Development in Practice. 2012; 20 (7): 855-865. doi: 10.1080/09614524.2010.508244
19. Griffiths M, Mannan H, MacLachlan M. Empowerment, advocacy and national development policy: A case study of Disabled Peoples' Organizations in Bolivia. In: Disability and international development: Towards inclusive global health. New York: Springer US; 2009.
20. Kleintjes S, Lund C, Swartz L. Organising for self-advocacy in mental health: Experiences from seven African countries. African Journal of Psychiatry. 2013; 16 (3): 187-195. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/ajpsy.v16i3.25
21. Kumaran K. Role of self-help groups in promoting inclusion and rights of persons with disabilities. Asia Pacific Disability Rehabilitation Journal. 2011; 22 (2): 105-113. doi: 10.5463/DCID.v22i2.78
22. Polu W, Mong A, Nelson C. Social and economic inclusion of people with disabilities: Practical lessons from Bangladesh. Development in Practice. 2015; 25 (8). doi: 1182-1188. doi: 10.1080/09614524.2015.1078289
23. Stewart R, Bhagwanjee A. Promoting group empowerment and self-reliance through participatory research: A case study of people with physical disability. Disability and Rehabilitation. 1999; 21 (7): 338-345. doi: 10.1080/096382899297585
24. Grills N. The importance of networks in public health practice [dissertation]. Melbourne: Monash University; 2013.
25. Agranoff R. Collaborative public management: New strategies for local governments. Washington D.C.: Georgetown University Press; 2003.
26. Duff J, Buckingham W. Strengthening of partnerships between the public sector and faith-based groups. The Lancet. 2015; 386 (10005): 1786-1794. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60250-1
27. Karam A, Clague J, Marshall K, Olivier J. The view from above: Faith and health. The Lancet. 2015; 386 (100005). doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)61036-4
28. Cornielje H. The role and position of Disabled People's Organisations in community based rehabilitation: Balancing between dividing lines. Asia Pacific Disability Rehabilitation Journal. 2009; 20 (1): 3-14.
29. UN: Best practices for including persons with disabilities in all aspects of development efforts. United Nations; c2011 [cited 2016 June 9] Available from: http://www.un.org/disabilities/documents/best_practices_publication_2011.pdf
30. Census of India: District Census Handbook Dehradun [Internet]. Census of India; [cited 2016 June 9] Available from: http://www.censusindia.gov.in/2011census/dchb/0505_PART_B_DCHB_DEHRADUN.pdf
31. Census of India: District Census Handbook Tehri Gahrwal [Internet]. Census of India; [cited 2016 June 9] Available from: http://www.censusindia.gov.in/2011census/dchb/0504_PART_B_DCHB_TEHRI%20GARHWAL.pdf
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Christian Journal for Global Health applies the Creative Commons Attribution License to all articles that we publish. Under this license, authors retain ownership of copyright for their articles or they can transfer copyright to their institution, but authors allow anyone without permission to copy, distribute, transmit, and/or adapt articles, even for commercial purposes so long as the original authors and Christian Journal for Global Health are appropriately cited.Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.